Why the study?
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction accounts for approximately 50% of global heart failure cases yet lacks robust pharmacological options.
Systematic Review (n=236)
The landscape of HFpEF pharmacological trials has expanded significantly since 2016, with a strong recent focus on metabolic and targeted agents like SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for approximately 50% of global heart failure cases yet lacks robust pharmacological options. This analysis maps HFpEF drug trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from 2003 to 2025. A systematic search conducted on November 10, 2025, identified HFpEF‐specific drug trials (LVEF ≥ 50%). Data regarding geography, phases, status, time, and drug classes were descriptively analyzed using R (version 4.3.1). Of the 272 trials, 236 qualified, with a notable surge post‐2016 (180 [76.3%]). The majority were U.S.‐led (138 [58.5%]). Phase Ⅱ trials were predominant, comprising 92 trials (39.0%), with 111 trials completed (47.0%) and 36 trials terminated (15.2%). The leading classes of drugs included SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and novel/targeted therapies, each represented in 31 trials (13.1%). The period from 2021 to 2025 highlighted a focus on SGLT2i (30 trials, or 27.8%) and an increase in GLP‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RA), following recent approvals (sacubitril/valsartan in 2021; empagliflozin/dapagliflozin in 2022–2023; and finerenone by the FDA in 2025). The expansion of trials post‐2016 favors metabolic and targeted agents. However, attrition rates underscore the need to prioritize phenotype‐specific and combination trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hou et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=236). Pharmacological therapies was evaluated on Trial characteristics including geography, phases, status, time, and drug classes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: