PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Journal of Clinical Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Validation of an Automated AI Algorithm for the Quantification of Major OCT Parameters in Retinal Vein Occlusion–Related Macular Edema

View Full Paper
ACAdriano CarnevaliDCDomenico ChisariRGRaffaella Gioia

Key Points

  • The research aims to validate a deep-learning algorithm for the automated detection and quantification of key OCT biomarkers in retinal vein occlusion-related macular edema.
  • Retrospective single-center study analyzing 93 eyes with retinal vein occlusion-related macular edema imaged with spectral-domain OCT.
  • AI quantified IRF/SRF volumes, ELM/EZ interruption, and HRF counts, compared to evaluations from two masked expert clinicians.
  • Performance assessed using ROC AUC, Cohen’s kappa, ICC, Pearson correlation, and Bland–Altman analysis.
  • AI demonstrated high diagnostic performance with AUC values of 0.969 for SRF, 0.871 for ELM, and 0.958 for EZ.
  • Substantial-to-almost-perfect agreement for SRF (kappa 0.807), ELM (kappa 0.788), and EZ (kappa 0.914).
  • HRF quantification showed strong correlation (r = 0.89, p < 0.001) and good agreement (ICC = 0.87) with minimal bias.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) commonly causes vision loss from macular edema (ME). OCT biomarkers (IRF, SRF, HRF, and ELM/EZ disruption) inform prognosis and treatment but are rarely quantified routinely due to time burden and interobserver variability. We aimed to validate a deep-learning algorithm for automated detection and quantification of key OCT biomarkers in RVO-ME versus expert assessment. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, 93 eyes with RVO-ME imaged with spectral-domain OCT were analyzed. The AI quantified IRF/SRF volumes, ELM/EZ interruption, and HRF counts. Two masked expert clinicians provided reference evaluations. Performance and agreement were assessed using ROC AUC, Cohen’s kappa, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson correlation, and Bland–Altman analysis. Image-quality metrics (foveal centration and retinal layer segmentation) were recorded. Results: The AI showed high diagnostic performance (AUC: SRF 0.969; ELM 0.871; EZ 0.958) and substantial-to-almost-perfect agreement (kappa: SRF 0.807; ELM 0.788; EZ 0.914). HRF quantification correlated strongly with experts (r = 0.89, p < 0.001), with very good agreement (ICC = 0.87) and minimal bias. Image-quality accuracy exceeded 98% for foveal centration and layer segmentation. Conclusions: This AI software enables reliable, rapid automated assessment of major OCT biomarkers in RVO-ME, supporting streamlined personalized management; prospective studies should confirm longitudinal monitoring and treatment-guidance value.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carnevali et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed0abb9154b0b82877b6fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103561
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper