Cross-sectional survey examines safety motivation's impact on safety climate in construction workers, suggesting intervention strategies.
The construction industry is one of the most hazardous occupational sectors globally, with persistently high rates of worker injuries and fatalities. This study examined the association between safety motivation and safety climate among construction workers, addressing a critical gap in understanding their bidirectional relationship. A cross-sectional survey was administered to 922 construction workers across multiple commercial projects within a single U.S. state, yielding 383 valid responses (41.5% response rate). The survey instrument measured safety motivation types (intrinsic, extrinsic, and negative) and multiple safety climate dimensions, including leadership and communication, safety procedures and training, peer support, recognition, and equipment availability. The results revealed that safety motivation demonstrated a significant positive correlation with overall safety climate (r = 0.467, p < 0.01), with leadership and communication showing the strongest association (r = 0.514, p < 0.01). Analysis of motivation types indicated that negative motivation (fear of accidents) predominated (41%), followed by extrinsic (34%) and intrinsic motivations (25%). The findings support a reciprocal relationship wherein safety motivation and safety climate mutually reinforce one another, influencing safety performance and outcomes. The study highlights the need for safety interventions that simultaneously address organizational climate factors and diverse individual motivational pathways to improve safety performance in the construction industry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fayaz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: