Key result
not cardiology, but standard medical).
Why the study?
Data on early changes in body composition and novel anthropometric indices reflecting central and visceral adiposity during acute-phase treatment in adolescents with MDD remain limited.
Does fluoxetine with or without low-dose quetiapine improve depressive symptoms and alter body composition in drug-naïve adolescent inpatients with severe major depressive disorder?
Cohort (n=23)
Does fluoxetine with or without low-dose quetiapine improve depressive symptoms and alter body composition in drug-naïve adolescent inpatients with severe major depressive disorder?
p-value: p=<0.001
Six weeks of fluoxetine-based pharmacotherapy improved depressive symptoms without short-term changes in anthropometric indices in adolescent inpatients with severe major depressive disorder.
Hypothesis-generating for visceral adiposity changes with fluoxetine in adolescent MDD; RCTs needed before clinical adoption.
Background: Data on early changes in body composition during acute-phase treatment in adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD) remain limited. In particular, the utility of novel anthropometric indices reflecting central and visceral adiposity has not been explored in this population. This study therefore aimed to examine short-term clinical outcomes alongside detailed anthropometric measures in drug-naïve adolescent inpatients receiving fluoxetine-based pharmacotherapy. Methods: Prospective, clinician-directed, non-randomized inpatient study. Drug-naïve adolescents with severe MDD (n = 23) received fluoxetine 20 mg/day, with some patients additionally receiving low-dose quetiapine (100 mg/day) based on clinical indication for six weeks. Depressive symptomatology was evaluated by questionnaires Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI). Conventional and novel anthropometric indices (BMI, WHtR; BRI, AVI, ABSI, BAI) were examined using the objective bioimpedance-derived method for body composition. Results: Depressive symptom severity decreased over the six-week treatment period, with significant improvements observed on both MADRS and CDI (time effect p < 0.001). Response and remission rates increased over time in the overall sample. No statistically significant changes were observed in conventional or novel anthropometric indices across the study period. Conclusions: In this prospective pilot cohort of adolescent inpatients with MDD, six weeks of fluoxetine-based pharmacotherapy was associated with improvement in depressive symptoms. No short-term changes were observed in anthropometric indices; however, given the small sample size and limited follow-up, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and cannot be considered definitive evidence of cardiometabolic safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kukucka et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Major depressive disorder (MDD) (n=23). Fluoxetine ± low-dose quetiapine was evaluated on Depressive symptomatology (MADRS and CDI) and anthropometric indices (p=<0.001). Six weeks of fluoxetine ± low-dose quetiapine in adolescents with severe MDD significantly improved depressive symptoms (time effect p<0.001) with no significant changes in body composition.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: