PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Integration of HIV, Hepatitis B, and C, and sexually transmitted infections services: A scoping review of the benefits and challenges

View Full Paper
PAParya Jangipour AfsharVYVahid Yazdi-FeyzabadiZAZahra Abdolahinia

Key Points

  • This review aims to explore the benefits and challenges of integrating services for HIV, hepatitis B, C, and STIs.
  • Conducted a scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
  • Searched databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until May 2025.
  • Applied a narrative inductive approach to analyze and report findings.
  • Identified 19,516 studies, with 118 selected for analysis.
  • Major benefits included improved health outcomes and cost-effectiveness across integrated service categories.
  • Challenges included infrastructure needs and potential employee stress from increased workloads.

Abstract

Background Integrating clinical programs and services is a cost-effective approach that can improve health and system outcomes. This review aimed to provide an overview of the benefits and challenges of integrated programs for HIV, hepatitis B and C, and STI services worldwide and provide recommendations for research and practice. Methods This scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. We searched electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until May 2025 to extract relevant studies. Additionally, we reviewed reputable grey literature sources, such as WHO and UNAIDS, and references from included publications for further relevant articles. Studies that had eligible criteria were included. We applied a narrative approach to report the findings through an inductive approach. Results Out of 19,516 initially identified studies, 118 were selected. The benefits and challenges of integration were classified into six categories: integrated service delivery, medical information and technology, human resources, health outcomes, collaboration and partnerships, and financial/physical resources. The significant benefits of these classifications include improved health outcomes, cost-effectiveness, enhanced efficiency, prevention of transmission, use of comprehensive care, reduction of time for receiving necessary services, increased knowledge and awareness, and improved cooperation. However, integration has some challenges, including the need for sufficient infrastructure, budget, human resources, and the potential for increased stress and work pressure on employees. Conclusions Prioritizing health is key to national development, requiring policies and resources for cost-effective patient and community benefits. This scoping review highlights the feasibility and advantages of integrating services for HIV, hepatitis B and C, and STIs. Our findings strongly support policymakers in prioritizing the planning and implementation of these integrated programs. An evidence-informed integration framework is needed to guide these actions effectively.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Afshar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed0c1b9154b0b82877ea5https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0348073
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework2005 · 37,264 citations
  2. 2Community-Based HIV and STI Prevention in Women Working in Indoor Sex Markets2012 · 36 citations
  3. 3Can biomedical and traditional health care providers work together? Zambian practitioners' experiences and attitudes towards collaboration in relation to STIs and HIV/AIDS care: a cross-sectional study2006 · 48 citations