Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores how the COVID-19 pandemic affects shadow education spending by income group, suggesting inequality may worsen.
This study uses the Gyeonggi Education Panel Study data to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on shadow education spending in South Korea. It uses the average propensity to consume (APC) for education to account for income changes, applying the double-difference method to eliminate grade effects. The findings reveal reduced nominal education expenses and APC for lower-income groups. The widening gap in shadow education spending between the lowest and highest income brackets worsens the Gini coefficient of education expenditure. Implementing compensatory measures like smaller classes, one-on-one tutoring, and adaptive teaching strategies tailored to individual students can help prevent temporary increases in inequality from becoming permanent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: