Demonstrates quantum characterisation using cavity optomechanics, suggesting insights for future experiments.
This record contains the complete data, code, figures, and sealed manifests for the CIIL v4 QED Full registered exploratory study. The study presents a comprehensive preregistered quantum characterisation of the Constraint Induced Identity Locking (CIIL) cascade operating in a physically grounded cavity-optomechanical system parameterised by the Teufel et al. (2011) aluminium drumhead experiment and the Wilson et al. (2011) Dynamical Casimir Effect circuit. Seven distinct mechanical drive geometries (V-types) at matched mean energy are characterised using the linearised quantum Langevin equation framework the standard theoretical formalism of cavity optomechanics across three independent pre-declared random seeds (42, 1234, 99999), with 200 trajectories per V-type per seed and 40+ physical observables per run spanning the vibration (V), photon field (L), and DCE threshold (M) regimes. Principal findings: Nine of twelve pre-declared hypotheses pass in every seed. The null separation partition four V-types with temporal modulation structure cleanly distinguished from the structural null, three falling inside the null distribution reproduces identically across all three seeds. The cascade burden δk*_L spans a 3.05-fold range from the stochastic broadband (V5) to the multi-harmonic (V4) drive geometry, and the downstream DCE pair production rate spans an 18-fold range over the same V-types at identical cooperativity and temperature. A previously unrecognised inverse relationship between spectral transfer efficiency H(ωm) and cascade burden quantifies the cavity's bandpass-filtering role in the V→L transition. The two hypothesis failures (zero logarithmic negativity E_N and near-zero DCE squeezing r_sq) are physically explained by the thermal bath dominance at the reference operating point (n̄_th = 29.1 at 15 mK, C = 100) and sub-threshold DCE operation respectively; both are consistent with the correct predictions of the Vitali–Serafini Lyapunov formalism and the Johansson et al. parametric amplification formula. Pre-registration: SHA-256 17b9fafce8f939191883222ae909c404830290fb4dd8eb0d021bf269f3de671e, timestamped and sealed prior to all paper-mode runs. Archive contents: ciil_v4_qed_full.py — complete simulation code results_V[1-8]_full.json × 3 seeds — per-V-type results including full bootstrap distributions for all 40+ observables manifest_full.json × 3 seeds — sealed SHA-256 manifests with finalization timestamps sweep_C.csv, sweep_T.csv — cooperativity and temperature sweep data sweep_dce.json — DCE threshold structure sweep across four decades ciil_v4_full_seed[42|1234|99999].csv — full trajectory-level data fig_V[1-8]_full.png — 8-panel diagnostic figures per V-type per seed fig_sweeps.png, fig_cross_regime.png, fig_hypothesis_verdicts.png — summary figures CIIL_v4_full_preregistration.pdf — sealed pre-registration document ciil_v4_paper.pdf / ciil_v4_paper.tex — full manuscript with LaTeX source Reproduction: python ciil_v4_qed_full.py --paper --seeds 42 1234 99999 Physical system: Teufel et al. (2011) Nature 475, 359 | Wilson et al. (2011) Nature 479, 376 | Aspelmeyer et al. (2014) Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 Prior CIIL records: doi:10.5281/zenodo.18147637 | doi:10.5281/zenodo.19679200 | doi:10.5281/zenodo.20031363
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kearon Allen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: