Population-based cohort study evaluates biologic therapies' effect on psoriatic arthritis risk in psoriasis patients, implying treatment choices may influence outcomes.
Background Patients with psoriasis (PsO) are at increased risk of developing psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Emerging evidence suggests that biologic therapies may differentially influence the development of PsA; however, there are no data on the relative ability of second-line biological therapy to prevent PsA. Aim To evaluate the impact of biologic therapy on the risk of incident PsA in patients with PsO with a focus on second-line biologic therapy. Methods We identified 2819 patients who initiated biologic therapy for PsO between 2002 and 2022, including Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) inhibitors, interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors, IL-23p19 inhibitors and IL-12/23 inhibitors. The primary outcome was incident PsA. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate arthritis-free survival and HRs for the development of PsA. Risk was assessed separately for first-line and second-line biologic therapy. Results Among 2819 patients with PsO initiating first-line biologic therapy, 400 (14.2%) developed PsA. In multivariable Cox regression, first-line anti-IL-23p19 agents were significantly associated with a lower risk of developing PsA compared with TNF inhibitors (HR 0.13; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.96; p=0.045). Among 1246 patients receiving second-line biologics, 125 (10.0%) developed PsA. Notably, in second-line therapy, only IL-17 inhibitors were independently associated with a statistically significant reduction in PsA risk versus TNF inhibitors (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.85; p=0.019), with trends observed for anti-IL-12/23 (HR 0.14; 95% CI 0.02 to 1.05; p=0.056) and anti-IL-23p19 (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.20 to 1.07; p=0.070). Conclusions This is the first study to evaluate second-line biological therapy in relation to PsA risk. IL-17 inhibitor therapy was significantly associated with a reduced risk of incident PsA compared with TNF inhibitors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: