Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives/Goals: Integrating lived experiences of people like patients and caregivers across translational research increases responsivity to local need and likelihood of meaningful results. The Community Health Consultant (CHC) Program is a dynamic, formalized source of lived experience advisors for the Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (ICTS). Methods/Study Population: Established in 2023, the CHC Program comprises: 1) ongoing recruitment of individuals committed to sharing their lived experiences and perspectives with researchers; 2) creation of profiles which detail an individual’s neighborhood involvement, lived experiences with health and social conditions, and interest in types of advisor activities; 3) matchmaking individuals with relevant lived experiences to community studios, boards, and community grant review processes; 4) a formalized compensation structure which prioritizes efficiently compensating consultants at a rate that demonstrates the value that lived experiences brings to research processes; and 5) consistent feedback loops with the CHC Program as a whole as well as with individual consultants. Results/Anticipated Results: To date, 152 individuals with wide-ranging backgrounds have joined as lived experience advisors to ICTS research. A sample of their collective individualities: * Chris is a community health worker in East Saint Louis. He wanted to be a liaison to the areas he says researchers do not go. “Researchers need to listen to people like me,” he says, “the urban community feels like it’s lost its voice.” * Terry is a mayor in north St. Louis. He says if a researcher is focused on a particular group, they should get “real feedback on how we feel these things benefit us or not benefit us.” * Melvia is an active senior citizen. She says, “The connection to the community is a wealth of information.” In 12 months, activities have included community studios (46), grant review (32), advisory committee linkages (6), and faculty lunch meetings (3). Discussion/Significance of Impact: A dynamic, formalized source of lived experience advisors is critical for mobilizing engagement activities to support ICTS researchers. A community engagement program acts as a natural coordinating hub, building and maintaining individual relationships while matchmaking and providing warm handoffs for lived experience linkages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Broughton et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: