Scoping review maps implementation and challenges of WHO/ICRC Basic Emergency Care course in Sub-Saharan Africa, suggesting policy implications.
Background: Basic emergency care is an important component of health system strengthening in resource-limited settings in sub-Saharan Africa. Objectives: This scoping review mapped and synthesised evidence on the implementation, capacity-building approaches, and policy implications of the WHO/ICRC Basic Emergency Care (BEC) course in the region. Methods: Twenty studies from 13 countries were included. Reported facilitators of BEC implementation included perceived relevance to frontline practice, practical and structured course content, contextual adaptation, mentorship, and training-of-trainers or cascade approaches. Reported barriers included time constraints, staffing shortages, limited infrastructure and emergency care resources, and technological challenges affecting digital reinforcement strategies. Across studies, BEC was generally associated with short-term improvements in provider knowledge, confidence, and perceived competence. However, implementation outcomes were reported inconsistently and were largely limited to acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness, with less evidence on adoption, cost, penetration, and sustainability. Evidence on longer-term retention, practice change, patient outcomes, and broader system-level impact remained limited. Conclusions: Overall, BEC appears to be a potentially useful and context-appropriate approach to strengthening frontline emergency care training, but stronger longitudinal and implementation-focused evaluations are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muwanguzi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: