This entry examines urban resilience to earthquakes in Japan, highlighting reactive and proactive approaches and their implications.
Urban resilience to earthquakes refers to the capacity of cities to anticipate, absorb, and adapt to seismic shocks through a combination of structural, institutional, and social mechanisms. In the context of Japan, one of the world’s most seismically active countries, this concept has evolved through both post-disaster learning and anticipatory planning. This entry examines two complementary trajectories of urban resilience in Japanese cities: reactive resilience, which develops through adaptation after a destructive event, and proactive resilience, which is embedded in preventive policies and preparedness strategies before a shock occurs. The city of Kobe, following the 1995 Great Hanshin Earthquake, exemplifies a reactive trajectory shaped by institutional reform, community mobilization, and regulatory change. In contrast, Tokyo represents a proactive resilience model based on stringent seismic standards, advanced monitoring and early warning systems, and a widespread culture of disaster preparedness. By comparing these trajectories, the entry outlines a conceptual framework for understanding urban seismic resilience as a dynamic process that integrates social adaptation, governance, and technological innovation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ceccarelli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: