Evaluates yield prediction using SPAD and MLP in maize, suggesting sustainable management strategies for nitrogen and irrigation.
Population growth, climate change, and increasing pressure on water and nitrogen resources pose major challenges for sustainable maize production. Maize yield is highly sensitive to inter-annual weather variability, yet many prediction approaches still rely on simple linear relationships and rarely integrate SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development)-based crop diagnostics with machine learning in multi-year nitrogen × irrigation experiments. In a three-year field experiment (2018–2020) in Hungary, we evaluated how basal and top-dressing fertilization and supplemental irrigation under contrasting water supply conditions affected the chlorophyll status and grain yield of a maize hybrid. Relative chlorophyll content was monitored using SPAD measurements at key phenological stages (V6, V12, and R1), and a multilayer perceptron (MLP) model was developed to improve yield prediction and to identify informative combinations of input variables. Five alternative scenarios (SC1–SC5) were tested by combining SPAD values with the fertilization rate, irrigation status, and crop year in different configurations, and model performance was assessed using root mean square deviation (RMSD), mean absolute error (MAE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), correlation (r, r2), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE), Kendall’s tau, and the index of agreement (d). Overall, SC4 (SPAD + fertilization + crop year + irrigation) achieved the best agreement with observed yields across most indices (e.g., r ≈ 0.93, NSE ≈ 0.86, KGE ≈ 0.90), whereas SC2 (SPAD + fertilization) produced the lowest prediction error on the independent test subset, indicating the most robust generalization. Basal fertilization with 60 and 120 kg N ha−1 significantly increased yield in 2019 and 2020, while irrigation generally enhanced yield except for the 30 kg N ha−1 top dressing applied at the V6–V12 stages. These results demonstrate that coupling SPAD measurements with MLP modeling and multi-criteria performance evaluation can support more efficient, site-specific nitrogen and irrigation decisions and help stabilize maize yields under variable climatic conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horváth et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: