Prospective study evaluates clinical safety and performance of synthetic calcium phosphate ceramic for bone regeneration, indicating promise for future use.
This prospective, single-arm post-market study aimed to evaluate the clinical safety and performance of a synthetic calcium phosphate ceramic used in alveolar bone regeneration procedures. Eighty adult patients requiring bone augmentation were treated with β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) under routine clinical indications. Surgical approaches were adapted to defect morphology. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and device deficiencies (DDs), while performance outcomes focused on two-dimensional radiographic bone assessment. Radiographic bone consolidation was defined as continuous trabecular radiopacity without radiolucent defects or clinical signs of infection. Patients were followed for six months post-surgery, with clinical and radiographic evaluations, as well as assessment of oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-14). All 80 patients (mean age: 47.2 ± 18.9 years; 51% male) completed the immediate postoperative assessment. Eleven DDs (granule loss) were observed postoperatively (13.8%) and no AEs. At six months, 71 patients (88.8%) completed follow-up. Radiographic bone repair was confirmed in all cases clinically observed and with follow-up X-ray (100%). No AEs or DDs reported (AE-free rate: 100%) at this follow-up. The median OHIP-14 score improved significantly at six months (p = 0.037), indicating better self-reported oral health. Given the observational design, absence of a control group, and partial reliance on non-radiographic follow-up, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Within these limitations, the synthetic calcium phosphate ceramic demonstrated a favorable short-term safety profile and apparent bidimensional radiographic signs of clinical performance under real-world conditions, rather than definitive evidence of effectiveness. Further controlled studies incorporating histological and volumetric analyses are warranted to confirm its regenerative potential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: