Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 1, 2015BMJ OpenOpen Access

Protocol—the RAMESES II study: developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluation

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

Trisha GreenhalghTrisha GreenhalghUniversity of OxfordGWGeoff WongUniversity of OxfordJJJustin JagoshUniversity of Hull

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Greenhalgh et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed1ecb124fe581985317bhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008567
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Reliability of Clinical Guideline Development Using Mail-Only versus In-Person Expert Panels2003 · 39 citations
  2. 2Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources2005 · 2,087 citations
  3. 3Protocol - realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: Evolving Standards (RAMESES)2011 · 301 citations
  4. 4Development of methodological guidance, publication standards and training materials for realist and meta-narrative reviews: the RAMESES (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses – Evolving Standards) project2014 · 288 citations
  5. 5A realist diagnostic workshop2012 · 368 citations