Background/Objectives: Molecular tumor profiling has recently transformed oncologic care delivery, establishing precision medicine as an essential approach for defining cancer biology and revealing intratumoral heterogeneity. The growing accessibility of advanced nucleic acid sequencing technologies has created a demand for specialized expertise in interpreting comprehensive genomic profiling results. Academic institutions currently employ a strategy of conducting initial broad-spectrum genomic testing, followed by matching patients to investigational therapies targeting their specific genomic alterations. Consequently, molecular tumor boards (MTBs) have emerged predominantly within major cancer centers and academic medical institutions, providing the specialized knowledge necessary to translate precision oncology into routine clinical care. However, despite the substantial benefits of collaborative case review within tumor boards, clinicians frequently encounter multiple barriers to effective MTB implementation. Methods: this report examines these challenges performing an exploratory quantitative synthesis approach and explores implementation strategies and best practices derived from collective institutional experiences, with the goal of establishing a functional MTB at the local level and thereby expanding oncology patient access to cutting-edge therapeutic options.
Antone et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: