Assesses mentoring relationships to identify at-risk dyads and knowledge gaps, suggesting targeted interventions.
Objectives/Goals: To develop a tool to assess mentoring relationships (mentor-mentee dyad) that can be used to monitor relationships over time to identify those at-risk along with knowledge and skills gaps for targeted coaching and career development initiatives and to evaluate mentoring programs. Methods/Study Population: Informed by literature review and faculty input, the CCTSI mentoring relationship assessment tool consists of parallel mentor and mentee questionnaires [applewebdata%3A//6E5CC409-7F40-4414-AF57-C97DF94108CD#_msocom_1]; requesting both a self- and partner-assessment. Assessments are completed upon K or T award initiation, and then every 9-12 months to characterize changes throughout the course of these CCTSI programs that include structured mentored training. Reports are generated for each mentor-mentee dyad as well as aggregate reports of mentors/mentees over time. After pilot testing with CCTSI K and T awardees, the tool was revised and then integrated into the K and T programs. Results/Anticipated Results: Principal component analysis of pilot data from 30 K and T awardees revealed that 5 questions be removed. The revised tool consists of 3 sections: assess the mentor (14 items), rate the relationship (9 items), and self-assessment (20 items for mentees, 16 items for mentors). The revised tool was completed by 12 T and 6 K mentee-mentor dyads. T dyad reports revealed 3 dyads at-risk. Aggregated data for T mentors and mentees identified areas for targeted intervention for expectation alignment, review/revise IDP, and sponsorship activities. Aggregated K data revealed that mentees rated their mentors more favorably than mentors’ self-assessments; discrepancies were noted related to career development. K mentees’ ratings corresponded to their mentors’ rating except for mentees’ ability to review/revise IDP. Discussion/Significance of Impact: The CCTSI mentoring relationship assessment tool demonstrates promise in identifying at-risk mentor-mentee relationships and for identifying knowledge/skills gaps for targeted career development initiatives. Future work will determine its usefulness for evaluating mentoring programs and capturing changes in relationships over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cicutto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: