Key result
Patient- and clinician-focused accrual strategies linked to a ~10-fold increase in monthly trial enrollment.
Why the study?
Trial accrual via electronic health records is limited by workflow and communication issues, prompting an evaluation of strategies to increase accrual.
Do accrual enhancement strategies improve enrollment rates in pragmatic EHR-embedded trials?
Observational
No
Do accrual enhancement strategies improve enrollment rates in pragmatic EHR-embedded trials?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.17% vs 0.33%
Implementing patient- and clinician-focused accrual enhancement strategies based on root cause analysis significantly improved enrollment in a pragmatic EHR-embedded trial.
Supports faster enrollment in pragmatic metformin vs lifestyle trials for prostate cancer; leaves open reproducibility across settings and diseases.
Objectives/Goals: Trial accrual via electronic health records (EHRs) are limited by workflow and communication issues. We used a root cause analysis to identify barriers and guide changes in a pragmatic trial of metformin vs lifestyle change for prostate cancer. The goal is to evaluate strategies to increase accrual. Methods/Study Population: We previously conducted a mixed-methods root cause analysis to examine barriers along the enrollment pathway. The study required two consents: 1) prostate cancer research consortium participation and 2) trial specific. We assessed the trial’s EHR-embedded consent workflow and Best Practice Alert (BPA) implementation and aggregated and harmonized data from multiple EHR sources to reconstruct the full enrollment pathway in a CONSORT diagram. We conducted semi-structured interviews with eligible patients ( n = 10) and engaged clinicians ( n = 4). Based on interview findings and enrollment pathway insights, the study team designed and evaluated impact of several accrual enhancement strategies. Results/Anticipated Results: We identified two types of feasible accrual enhancement strategies: 1) patient-focused, including a) tracking consent status in the enrollment pathway report; b) proactively messaging patients with upcoming visits about consent; and 2) clinician-focused, including a) tailored EHR-based messages before eligible patient visits; b) targeted education; and c) BPA optimization to improve reach to appropriate clinicians. In the 6 months prior to strategy implementation, enrollment averaged 0.33 patients/month. In the 6 months post-implementation, enrollment increased to an average of 3.17 patients/month. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Sustained enrollment in pragmatic trials demands greater-than-expected engagement. In partnership, the study and informatics teams oversaw intervention processes based on trial-specific issues, identified issues quickly, explored feasible solutions, and refined the process to support trial success.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwan et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Prostate cancer. Accrual enhancement strategies (patient-focused and clinician-focused) vs. Pre-implementation standard workflow was evaluated on Average monthly enrollment (patients/month). Implementation of patient- and clinician-focused accrual enhancement strategies increased average trial enrollment from 0.33 to 3.17 patients per month.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: