Key result
Midgestation maternal echocardiography fails to improve preeclampsia screening beyond standard risk factors and biomarkers.
Why the study?
The role of maternal cardiac function in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia and its potential to improve screening performance remains unclear.
Does routine cardiac assessment at midgestation improve the performance of screening for preeclampsia compared to established biomarkers?
Cohort (n=4,795)
Does routine cardiac assessment at midgestation improve the performance of screening for preeclampsia compared to established biomarkers?
Routine echocardiographic assessment of maternal cardiac function at midgestation is not recommended for preeclampsia screening as it does not add incremental value to established clinical and biomarker risk factors.
BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia (PE) is an independent risk factor for adverse maternal cardiovascular outcomes. The role of maternal cardiac function in the pathophysiology of PE remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe differences in cardiac function at midgestation between women who develop PE and those with uncomplicated pregnancy and to establish whether routine cardiac assessment at midgestation can improve performance of screening for PE achieved by established biomarkers. METHODS: Mean arterial pressure was measured, medical history was obtained, and left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic functions were assessed using standard echocardiography and speckle tracking imaging. Uterine artery pulsatility index and serum placental growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 were measured. RESULTS: In 4,795 pregnancies, 126 (2.6%) developed PE. Following multivariable analysis, peripheral vascular resistance was significantly higher and LV global longitudinal systolic strain, ejection fraction, cardiac output, and left atrial area were mildly lower in women who developed PE compared to those who did not. There was a weak association between maternal cardiovascular indices and biomarkers of placental perfusion and function. Cardiac indices did not improve the performance of screening for PE on top of maternal risk factors, mean arterial pressure, and biomarkers of placental perfusion and function. CONCLUSION: Women who develop PE have an increase in peripheral vascular resistance and a mild reduction in LV functional cardiac indices long before PE development. However, cardiac indices do not improve the performance of screening for PE; thus, their routine clinical use is not advocated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gibbone et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Preeclampsia (n=4,795). Maternal cardiac function indices vs. Women with uncomplicated pregnancy was evaluated on Development of preeclampsia. Maternal cardiac indices at midgestation did not improve screening for preeclampsia, which developed in 126 (2.6%) of 4,795 pregnancies, on top of established risk factors and biomarkers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: