PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2016Heart154 citationsOpen Access

Cardiac rehabilitation delivery model for low-resource settings

SGSherry L. GraceKTKaram Turk-AdawiACAashish Contractor

Structured PICO

P
Population
Patients with cardiovascular disease in low-resource and middle-income countries
I
Intervention
Adapted cardiac rehabilitation delivery model using non-physician healthcare workers in non-clinical settings

A consensus statement proposing an adapted, low-cost cardiac rehabilitation delivery model for low-resource settings utilizing non-physician healthcare workers.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular disease is a global epidemic, which is largely preventable. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is demonstrated to be cost-effective and efficacious in high-income countries. CR could represent an important approach to mitigate the epidemic of cardiovascular disease in lower-resource settings. The purpose of this consensus statement was to review low-cost approaches to delivering the core components of CR, to propose a testable model of CR which could feasibly be delivered in middle-income countries. METHODS: A literature review regarding delivery of each core CR component, namely: (1) lifestyle risk factor management (ie, physical activity, diet, tobacco and mental health), (2) medical risk factor management (eg, lipid control, blood pressure control), (3) education for self-management and (4) return to work, in low-resource settings was undertaken. Recommendations were developed based on identified articles, using a modified GRADE approach where evidence in a low-resource setting was available, or consensus where evidence was not. RESULTS: Available data on cost of CR delivery in low-resource settings suggests it is not feasible to deliver CR in low-resource settings as is delivered in high-resource ones. Strategies which can be implemented to deliver all of the core CR components in low-resource settings were summarised in practice recommendations, and approaches to patient assessment proffered. It is suggested that CR be adapted by delivery by non-physician healthcare workers, in non-clinical settings. CONCLUSIONS: Advocacy to achieve political commitment for broad delivery of adapted CR services in low-resource settings is needed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Grace et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ff3e2e581c6e761e775ea8https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-309209
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper