Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 25, 2016British Journal of Sports Medicine

Does revision ACL reconstruction measure up to primary surgery? A meta-analysis comparing patient-reported and clinician-reported outcomes, and radiographic results

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AGAlberto GrassiIstituto Ortopedico RizzoliCAClare L. ArdernUniversity of HelsinkiGMGiulio Maria Marcheggiani MuccioliIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Grassi et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ff3fe364548b97a42d62e6https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-094948
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample2005 · 9,321 citations
  2. 2The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.1998 · 8,399 citations
  3. 3Younger Patients Are at Increased Risk for Graft Rupture and Contralateral Injury After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction2014 · 526 citations
  4. 4Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement2009 · 83,708 citations
  5. 5The Effect of Medial Versus Lateral Meniscectomy on the Stability of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knee2010 · 428 citations