Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Note: This is a description of the paper and not the abstract as it appeared in the print journal. Some economists believe that the competitive survival of non-interest-bearing currency--the absence of price competition from markets for stored-value cards, banknotes, and token coins--implies a waste of resources on nonprice competition. We argue to the contrary that market forces drive issuers toward an efficient mix of price and nonprice competition. Where economic costs (rather than legal restrictions) rule out the delivery of interest on currency, competition exclusively along non-price dimensions is consistent with efficiency. We graphically illustrate such a case.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
White et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: