The original three-dimensional elasticity problem of isotropic prismatic beams has been solved analytically by the variational asymptotic method (VAM). The resulting classical model (Euler-Bernoulli-like) is the same as the superposition of elasticity solutions of extension, Saint-Venant torsion, and pure bending in two orthogonal directions. The resulting refined model (Timoshenko-like) is the same as the superposition of elasticity solutions of extension, Saint-Venant torsion, and both bending and transverse shear in two orthogonal directions. The fact that the VAM can reproduce results from the theory of elasticity proves that two-dimensional finite-element-based cross-sectional analyses using the VAM, such as the variational asymptotic beam sectional analysis (VABS), have a solid mathematical foundation. One is thus able to reproduce numerically with VABS the same results for this problem as one obtains from three-dimensional elasticity, but with orders of magnitude less computational cost relative to three-dimensional finite elements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: