Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIM: We have recently demonstrated that the circulating level of LOX-1 ligand containing apoB (LAB) predicts the risk of cardiovascular events; however, as is the case in other assays measuring oxidized LDL (oxLDL), chemical unstability and inter-lot variance of standard oxLDL may limit the utility of measuring LAB. This study aimed to develop an alternative protein standard that is simultaneously recognized by LOX-1 and anti-apoB antibody instead of copper-oxidized LDL. METHODS AND RESULTS: cDNAs encoding the variable regions of anti-LOX-1 monoclonal antibody were cloned from hybridomas and reorganized to express anti-LOX-1 single-chain variable fragment (Fv). cDNAs of four regions of human apoB (B1 to B4), which were reported to be epitopes of many anti-apoB antibodies, were also cloned. After confirming the respective reactivity of Fv and apoB fragments to LOX-1 and anti-apoB antibodies, cDNAs of Fv and apoB fragments were connected to express Fv-ApoB chimeric proteins. These fusion proteins were found to be recognized by both LOX-1 and anti-apoB antibodies. Among them, the fusion proteins of Fv-B1 and Fv-B3 gave saturable binding curves against immobilized LOX-1 when detected by anti-apoB antibodies. The binding curves of different Fv-B1 preparations to LOX-1 were almost identical while those of oxLDL varied among the preparations, suggesting better quality control of Fv-B1 preparations. CONCLUSIONS: The fusion proteins composed of Fv-form anti-LOX-1 antibody and apoB fragment are useful alternatives to copper-oxidized LDL in determining LAB, which would facilitate the application of modified LDL analyses to the clinical diagnosis and risk evaluation of cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iwamoto et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: