Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Circulating Extracellular Vesicles (cEVs) could represent new non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis in tumors. In the context of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) immunotherapy there's a great need for novel predictive and prognostic biomarkers. This study aims to analyze cEVs microRNAs in serum of advanced stage NSCLC patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50% at diagnosis, before first-line pembrolizumab, to evaluate their possible role as potential biomarkers for immunotherapy response prediction and outcomes. Methods: cEVs were isolated from serum of healthy subjects and NSCLC patients at diagnosis. All patients had tumor PD-L1≥50% and cEVs were extracted before first-line pembrolizumab treatment. cEVs were then characterized for morphology, integrity, concentration, size and protein contaminants. Subsequently, microRNA content (miR-10a, miR-21, miR-22, miR-30a, miR-34a, miR-106b, miR-125b, miR-150, miR-155, miR-181a, miR-181b, miR-451a) was investigated by digital PCR. Additionally, miRNA-targets and their roles were evaluated. All data were associated with immunotherapy response, Progression Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) and metastases. Results: =0.05/0.04, respectively) and of ECOG-PS=0. Discussion: This is the first study that investigated specific potential serum cEV miRNAs to predict with high accuracy immunotherapy response and prognosis in specific metastatic NSCLC patients, already at diagnosis. Collectively, our cEV miRNA analysis identifies novel circulating biomarkers that are easily accessible and non-invasive, offering a potential blood-based tool to guide personalized medicine in NSCLC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lamorte et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: