Why the study?
Does low-molecular-weight heparin improve outcomes in the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolic events in cancer patients?
Does low-molecular-weight heparin improve outcomes in the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolic events in cancer patients?
LMWH provides a favorable therapeutic index for the prophylaxis and treatment of VTE in cancer patients.
LMWH may be favored for cancer VTE; leaves open need for updated RCTs versus DOACs.
Patients with malignant neoplastic diseases represent a high-risk population relative to thromboembolic disease. With the advent of improved and accessible diagnostic technology, for example, ultrasound and/or spiral CT scans, timely diagnosis of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) is readily accomplished. The introduction of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) approximately two decades ago (in contrast to unfractionated heparin and vitamin K antagonists) has provided a class of agents with a favorable therapeutic index. In the review to follow, the literature regarding the use of LMWH in oncologic patient populations is summarized. Topics addressed include prophylaxis, and treatment as well as consideration of the potential anti-neoplastic properties of this class of drugs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chao et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: