Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: ) to guide treatment choices in patients with depression and/or anxiety compared with treatment as usual from the US societal perspective. METHODS: randomized controlled trial. Quality-adjusted life-years and direct and indirect costs attributable to depression and anxiety were estimated and compared over a 3-year time horizon. We conducted extensive deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the results. RESULTS: group. Incremental quality-adjusted life-year gain (0.49) and cost savings (US$6800) were substantially larger in patients with severe depression (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score ≥ 25). CONCLUSION: test to guide the treatment of patients with depression and anxiety may be a dominant strategy, as it improves quality-adjusted life-years and decreases overall costs over a 3-year time horizon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Najafzadeh et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: