Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 17, 2012BMC Public HealthOpen Access

A comparison of cancer burden and research spending reveals discrepancies in the distribution of research funding

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ACAshley J. R. CarterCalifornia State University, Long BeachCNCecine N NguyenCalifornia State University, Long Beach

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Carter et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ff8e720acff741bf772f44https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-526
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cancer Statistics, 20102010 · 12,620 citations
  2. 2Years of life lost (YLL) from cancer is an important measure of population burden — and should be considered when allocating research funds2005 · 379 citations
  3. 3Years of Potential Life Lost (YPLL)—What Does it Measure?1990 · 412 citations
  4. 4Cost of Care for Elderly Cancer Patients in the United States2008 · 706 citations
  5. 5The value of DALY life: problems with ethics and validity of disability adjusted life years1999 · 331 citations