Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
:Globalization is economic in its origin, based on the removal of barriers and borders to allow the movement of trade and the free movement of goods and capital. Although economy and trade are intended for themselves in globalization, globalization is not limited to the West alone, but to the cultural and social life, including the Provisions of the behavioral patterns, schools of thought, psychological attitudes, and that shaping the identity of the peoples, nations and individuals. The paper sheds some light on the jurisprudential attempting efforts to show concept and significance of the phenomenon of globalization are varied and they did not report the basic right way yet. Some of those jurisprudences were limited to describe its phenomenon as a process of Americanization of the world, and any dissemination of American culture. We have traced some negative risks of globalization, and its effects on the Arab youth at all levels, but it does not justify the prevailing view of the Arab people and considering globalization as strategy of US imperialist, and that globalization is the Americanization of the world, and its goal is getting weak States and looting and impoverishment. Despite the capture of one of the central mechanisms of globalization, its opinion is misleading in terms of dealing with globalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammad Salim Al-Rawashdeh (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: