Although they routinely evaluate pervasive or ubiquitous computing applications, researchers have difficulty comparing results rigorously and quantitatively. The lack of a widely accepted framework for user evaluations of ubiquitous applications hampers their efforts. By proposing such a framework, we hope to help researchers compare results, create ubiquitous computing design guidelines, develop effective discount evaluation techniques, understand the appropriateness of different evaluation techniques, and develop a more complete structure so they can avoid overlooking key areas of evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scholtz et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: