Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To assess the efficacy of platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) and investigate the pretreatment predictors of the response. Patients and Methods: A total of 219 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO 2009) stage IB2-IIA2 LACC who received platinum-based NACT from December 2007 to December 2017 were reviewed, and their clinical-pathological characteristics and follow-up data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The baseline characteristics of age, FIGO stage, histology, tumor differentiation, tumor size, and clinical outcomes, including post-operative pathological risk factors, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the responders and non-responders. Results: The overall response rate was 58.9% (129/219), and 19 (8.7%) patients achieved pathologically complete remission. NACT responders showed significantly better OS and PFS than non-responders (P OS = 0.002, P PFS = 0.002). The response to NACT was identified as an independent risk factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.453, 95% confidence intervals [95% CI], 1.125– 5.348, P = 0.024) and PFS (HR = 2.196, 95% CI, 1.183– 4.076, P = 0.013), and patients with IB2/IIA1 and a tumor size of < 5 cm tended to receive better response than patients with IIA2 ( P = 0.004) and a tumor size of ≥ 5 cm ( P = 0.027). Conclusion: The response rate of platinum-based NACT was approximately 60%. The response to NACT was an independent risk factor for prognosis, and patients with earlier stage and smaller tumor tended to respond better to NACT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: