Are non-HDL-C and Apo-B more reliable predictors of CAD risk compared to LDL-C?
Non-HDL-C is recommended as a practical and reliable marker for routine lipid panels to better assess CAD risk, particularly in resource-limited settings.
The traditional approach to the management of coronary artery disease (CAD) focuses mainly on low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) which is often considered a crucial risk factor for the progression of atherosclerosis. Despite its extensive use in predicting CAD risk, it has become a sub-optimal marker owing to several limitations. Recently, non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and apolipoprotein-B (Apo-B) have been substantiated to be more reliable predictors of CAD risk. On the basis of available evidence, it is fair to say that non-HDL-C is a more realistic primary target of therapy and can be used for initial screening. In the current scenario, India being a developing country, the population would not be burdened with additional cost of Apo-B estimation as non-HDL-C can be estimated in the non-fasting state which makes it both patient and clinician friendly. Considering this fact, the aim of the present review article is to highlight the reliability and efficacy of non-HDL-Cholesterol and hence make recommendations to incorporate non-HDL-C in routine lipid panel for better assessment of CAD.
Aggarwal et al. (Sat,) studied this question.