Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The options to adjust accurate relativistic energy-consistent pseudopotentials for actinides are explored using uranium as an example. The choice of the reference data and the core-valence separation is discussed in view of a targeted accuracy of 0.04 eV or better in atomic energy differences such as excitation energies and ionization potentials. A new small-core pseudopotential attributing 60 electrons to the core has been generated by an energy adjustment to state-averaged multiconfiguration Dirac-Hartree-Fock/Dirac-Coulomb-Breit Fermi nucleus reference data of 100 nonrelativistic configurations of U to U(7+) corresponding to 30190 reference J levels. At the finite-difference multiconfiguration Hartree-Fock level the mean absolute errors are 0.002 and 0.024 eV for the configurations and J levels, respectively. A first molecular application to uranium monohydride UH yields very satisfactory agreement with results from all-electron calculations based on the Douglas-Kroll-Hess Hamiltonian.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dolg et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: