Anthropometric, Cardiopulmonary and Metabolic Benefits of the High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate, Low-Intensity or Control for Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Figures

• 

  Figure 1. Flowchart.

• 

  Figure 2. Forest plot for body weight. HIIT—high-intensity interval training, MIT—moderate-intensity training, LIT—low-intensity training, CI—confidence interval, IV—inverse variance, SD—standard deviation.

• 

  Figure 3. Forest plot for BMI. HIIT—high-intensity interval training, MIT—moderate-intensity training, LIT—low-intensity training, CI—confidence interval, IV—inverse variance, SD—standard deviation.

• 

  Figure 4. Forest plot for systolic BP. HIIT—high-intensity interval training, MIT—moderate-intensity training, LIT—low-intensity training, CI—confidence interval, IV—inverse variance, SD—standard deviation.

• 

  Figure 5. Forest plot for diastolic BP. HIIT—high-intensity interval training, MIT—moderate-intensity training, LIT—low-intensity training, CI—confidence interval, IV—inverse variance, SD—standard deviation.

• 

  Figure 6. Forest plot for VO2max. HIIT—high-intensity interval training, MIT—moderate-intensity training, LIT—low-intensity training, CI—confidence interval, IV—inverse variance, SD—standard deviation.

• 

  Figure 7. Forest plot for HbA1c. HIIT—high-intensity interval training, MIT—moderate-intensity training, LIT—low-intensity training, CI—confidence interval, IV—inverse variance, SD—standard deviation.