Uncovers how stellar separation affects spin–orbit alignment in visual binaries, suggesting different formation pathways.
Stellar binaries may form through several formation pathways, including disk or core fragmentation. Their spin–orbit angles are a signature of formation, although individual measurements for visual binaries are limited and broad. A seminal work by A. Hale found that visual binaries with separations ≲30 au tend to be more aligned, which laid the groundwork for binary formation theories. However, A. B. Justesen & S. Albrecht found that underestimated stellar radii lead to inaccurate spin–orbit angles and that Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) statistics do not provide meaningful population-level constraints, even with updated radii. Using a hierarchical Bayesian model to reanalyze their dataset, we find evidence with a Bayes factor of 12 for two subpopulations of spin–orbit angles separated by a ∼31–38 au cutoff. Binaries inside (outside) the cutoff are more (less) aligned, consistent with a Fisher distribution with κ = 48 ( κ = 6). We also find possible indications of a secondary cutoff at ∼10–17 au, although more data are required to resolve this prediction. These cutoffs may mark transitions between formation pathways: closer-in binaries tend to form aligned in a shared protostellar disk, while wider binaries tend to form less aligned through turbulent fragmentation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: