Evaluates smoking cessation interventions, showing significant abstinence improvement in adults aged 55–64 with CVD, suggesting effective secondary prevention strategies.
Background: Smoking is a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Evaluating targeted strategies for smoking cessation in high-risk groups is crucial for secondary prevention. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of smoke cessation interventions (SCIs) in promoting continuous abstinence from smoking among patients aged 55–64 years with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted from June 2024 using PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library. Study selection and reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. The effect size was calculated as an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. A random-effects model was employed for the meta-analysis. The Risk of Bias (RoB) for included studies was assessed using the Cochrane RoB-2 tool. Publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot and the Egger regression test. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results: Nineteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated the efficacy of SCIs in CVD patients. The pooled OR was 0.65 (95% CI 0.48, 0.89), with a P < 0.07, indicating that SCIs significantly reduced the odds of continued smoking in the intervention group by 35% compared to usual, minimal, or no care. The observed heterogeneity was high ( I ² = 76%). Conclusion: The implementation of smoking cessation interventions was effective in promoting continuous abstinence from smoking among patients aged 55–64 years with CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asif et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: