Demonstrates enhanced path tracking precision in automated guided vehicles, suggesting significant efficiency improvements.
Path tracking accuracy and stability are crucial for Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) in intelligent manufacturing. Traditional Pure Pursuit (PP) methods involve an inherent trade-off: small look-ahead distances provide quick response but cause oscillations, whereas large distances improve smoothness at the expense of corner-cutting. To overcome this, we propose an A daptive M ulti-Scale F usion P ure P ursuit (AMSF-PP) method. It integrates adaptive Loess path preprocessing for noise suppression, a multi-step predictive controller for rapid local response, and a traditional PP controller for global guidance, combined via a real-time weighting mechanism. Simulation results show that AMSF-PP reduces average lateral error by up to 59% compared to conventional PP. Notably, in real-vehicle experiments on a resource-constrained industrial PC, AMSF-PP achieves higher tracking precision than Model Predictive Control (MPC) while being approximately 21 times more computationally efficient (1.15 ms vs 24.50 ms). These findings establish AMSF-PP as a lightweight, efficient, and robust solution for high-precision industrial path tracking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: