Randomized trial finds improved dose distribution for superficial brain metastases with scanned electron beams, suggesting promising treatment options.
Contemporary particle accelerators allow for the generation of a narrow pencil beamof electrons which can be scanned to deliver a clinical dose distribution at an ultra-high (FLASH)dose rate. This study develops a radiotherapy beam model and discrete ordinates Boltzmann solverfor such an accelerator and then applies the method to treatment planning for superficial brainmetastases. Approach. Beam profiles for the quasi-monoenergetic 17.5 MeV electron beam fromthe Photo Injector Test facility at Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron laboratory in Zeuthen (PITZ)were measured at various depths in a water tank using radiochromic film. The incident radiationwas modelled as a Gaussian source and the electron distribution in the patient was modelled usingclassical observations with continuous slowing down approximation (CSDA). This distributionthen formed the fixed source component in a discrete ordinates Boltzmann solver. The dose calculation method was then applied to a retrospective study of six patients with superficial brainmetastases. The dose due to scanned electrons was compared with that from a single passivelyscattered proton beam at ultra-high dose rate (UHDR), a proton arc, and a robotic photon treatment. Main results. The calculated dose distribution in a homogeneous water phantom agreedwith the measured data to within the 3% experimental uncertainty at all depths. Scanned electronbeams were able to provide dose distributions for superficial brain metastases that had a betterconformity index than either passively scattered protons or robotic photon treatment (1.02 ± 0.13versus 1.54 ± 0.13 and 1.35 ± 0.26 respectively; median ± hemi-range; p < 0.05). Brain V12Gy andskin dose were acceptable for all treatments. Significance. The dose calculation provides a fast andefficient method for inverse planning in the potential clinical application of a scanned electronbeam at UHDR.Theresults show that such an approach could be useful in the treatment of superficial target volumes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bedford et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: