Demonstrates enhanced postoperative recurrence prediction in colorectal cancer, indicating progress for precision oncology.
Postoperative recurrence remains a critical challenge in the clinical management of colorectal cancer (CRC), affecting approximately 30%–50% of patients who undergo curative-intent surgery. Precise risk stratification is essential for personalized treatment and improved prognosis, yet traditional markers often fall short in predictive accuracy. This study introduces RSCO-Net , an integrated multimodal framework that leverages a Refined Single Candidate Optimizer (RSCO) for enhanced CRC recurrence prediction. Our approach uniquely combines 512-dimensional visual features from whole-slide images (WSIs) via attention-based multiple-instance learning (MIL) with 512-dimensional semantic embeddings from pathology reports via transformer-based language models. To navigate the high-dimensional, non-convex optimization landscape of the fused 1024-dimensional feature space, we propose the RSCO metaheuristic. RSCO employs a two-phase search strategy that balances global exploration with local exploitation, coupled with an escape mechanism to avoid stagnation. Experimental evaluations on the TCGA-COAD/READ dataset demonstrate that RSCO-Net achieves a state-of-the-art AUROC of 0.839 and an AUPRC of 0.731, significantly outperforming benchmark population-based optimizers and unimodal baselines. Ablation studies confirm that RSCO provides a 2.1% gain over simple candidate optimization, while multimodal fusion contributes a 9.1% improvement over WSI-only models. Furthermore, we provide clinical interpretability through SHAP-based feature importance and attention-driven WSI visualization. Our findings establish RSCO-Net as a robust and computationally efficient tool for precision oncology, advancing the frontier of multimodal medical AI for CRC prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: