Quality improvement initiative identifies patient-centered strategies to improve idiopathic hypersomnia management by clinicians.
Introduction The management of idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) represents a significant challenge in clinical practice owing to the heterogeneity of symptoms, impact of comorbidities, and individual patient needs, goals, and preferences – all informing treatment selection and ongoing management. This initiative aimed to characterize the challenges that impede optimal IH management and identify patient-centered practices that facilitate quality care. Methods Between May 2024 and July 2025, three US-based sleep clinics participated in a quality improvement initiative. Clinics participated in audit-feedback sessions to evaluate real-world data, identify gaps in evidence-based assessment and management of IH, and develop action plans. Follow-up sessions were held to assess progress and refine action plans. Data was collected through baseline and follow-up clinician surveys and patient chart audits. Patient survey data was collected in collaboration with Hypersomnia Foundation. Results Clinicians’ (N=139) top challenge in managing IH included staying current with emerging evidence (41%), difficulties in therapy selection and dosing (33%), and identifying and managing comorbidities (31%). Most clinicians felt familiar with treatment options (55%; Likert 3/4/5) and felt confident in providing timely, evidence-based, and coordinated care (54%; Likert 3/4/5). While about half of patients (N=90) had cardiovascular comorbidities, only 59% of clinicians regularly assessed them and 41% said that managing comorbidities was a barrier to treating IH. Survey findings also revealed gaps in perceptions of shared decision-making with clinicians reporting that goals and preferences were discussed (59%) while only 35% of patients reported the same. Clinicians set goals to individualize care through evaluating the impact of comorbidities, tailoring treatment to patient-specific needs, and engaging patients in their care. Increases in counseling related to medications, comorbidities, and medication adherence were observed in a patient chart audit (N=90) as well as improvements in incorporating patient factors and patient engagement on surveys (N=25) upon follow-up. Conclusion This initiative demonstrated actionable strategies to personalize IH management through the incorporation of patient-specific factors, needs, and goals into treatment and the impact of quality improvement measures on the delivery of patient-centered care. Support (if any) This program was supported by an independent medical educational grant from Jazz Pharmaceuticals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zyborowicz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: