Assesses emotional distress in COPD, indicating a need for tailored interventions.
Purpose: Emotional distress is prevalent in patients with COPD and highly relevant to patients. Research in chronic disease indicates that illness-related emotional distress might be specific and sensitive enough to explain self-management behaviour. However, as no currently available instrument assesses COPD-related emotional distress (CRED), it has only been assessed regarding overall distress, using mainly anxiety and depression as outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and test a preliminary item list to measure CRED. Patients and Methods: Following Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines, a multistep mixed-method study was conducted. Based on an earlier qualitative study and literature review, a conceptual framework and item list were developed. The item list’s content validity was assessed via patient interviews using cognitive debriefing techniques and a survey involving a panel of clinicians. Finally, its psychometric properties were tested in a cross-sectional study. Construct validity was established by comparing the CRED-V1 with established questionnaires like the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the modified Medical Research Counsel (mMRC) dyspnoea scale. Results: The first German COPD-Related Emotional Distress questionnaire–version 1 (CRED–V1) contained 36 items. Its content validity was confirmed by nine patients and ten clinicians. Psychometric testing in 264 patients with COPD revealed two formative (symptom- and treatment-related) and four reflective (restricted mobility-, restricted relationship-, disease unpredictability- and stigma-related) subcategories. For all reflective subscales, Cronbach’s alpha values were > 0.8. Structural equation modelling was possible for 32 items: An R 2 value of 0.656 allowed the calculation of a CRED total score (CRED–TS). A regression model using the CRED-TS as the outcome variable showed that the most important explanatory variables were the CAT and HADS depression scores. Conclusion: This work reports the initial development of a new innovative tool for the assessment of CRED in patients with COPD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmid‐Mohler et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: