Evaluates the impact of GLP-1RAs on obstructive sleep apnea treatment patterns, indicating a significant shift towards usage.
Introduction GLP-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1RA) therapy is reshaping obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment. As GLP-1RAs become more prevalent, their role within clinical care is important to understand, whether first-line therapy or as a complementary tool. This research evaluates current GLP-1RAs usage in OSA and assesses the impact of these treatment patterns. Methods A 10-minute online survey was conducted in October 2025 among 50 ENTs and 100 Sleep Medicine Specialists (SMS). Respondents were required to have 2–30 years of post-residency experience, spend ≥75% of their time in direct patient care, and see patients that were actively on GLP-1RAs while also implanting or referring for Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation (HGNS). In addition, we assessed GLP-1RA usage with Truveta’s EHR data (120M patients, >30 health systems), including ~2.8M OSA diagnoses. Results Claims data show that 70% of the diagnosed OSA population is obese, driving a fast uptake in GLP-1RA usage. In addition, survey results indicate patients seeking treatment for OSA has increased over the past 6 months. SMS are utilizing GLP-1RAs in 29% of first-line OSA treatments. When CPAP is utilized as first-line, GLP-1RAs are also used in ~50% of patients as adjunct therapy. In our survey, 40% of physicians are still trialing GLP-1RAs with most planning to decide on adoption within 12 months. Survey respondents anticipate a short-term decrease in HGNS with a long-term net increase in implant volume. From claims data, the HGNS-BMI eligible patient population grew significantly post-GLP-1RA use. Conclusion Survey and claims data support that the majority of patients diagnosed with OSA live with obesity and are now prescribed with GLP-1RAs. Specialists report current or upcoming future use of GLP-1 RAs for people with obesity and sleep apnea. The findings suggest that GLP-1 RAs are currently disrupting traditional OSA treatment patterns, and that these medications may expand the total pool of patients seeking treatment for CPAP-alternatives, ultimately increasing the HGNS-BMI eligible population. Support (if any) This research was funded by LivaNova.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mack et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: