Evaluates the PAP Issue Stratification Tool to identify issues affecting PAP adherence in adults with sleep apnea, indicating implications for targeted interventions.
Introduction Treatment-related problems during early positive airway pressure therapy (PAP) create adherence barriers. We evaluated the factor structure of a brief screening tool for common PAP problems, determined a scoring approach, and assessed predictive validity for non-adherence to support PAP troubleshooting. Methods A one-group, prospective observational design at Kaiser Permanente Southern California consecutively enrolled PAP-naïve adults with moderate-severe OSA (AHI4%≥15) who accepted PAP (autoCPAP). A PAP Issue Stratification Tool (PIST) survey (content validated by patient and sleep clinician panels) included 32 common PAP issues rated on a 4-point Likert scale for the question, “how much does each issue bother you?” Patients who used PAP≥30 minutes on ≥2 of first 5 days received a survey link on treatment day 5, 10, and 30. Objective PAP use was collected for days 1-90. Exploratory factor analysis (promax) informed domain structure and scoring. PIST total and domain scores were calculated on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating more bothersome issues. Using Day 10 PIST responses, we compared total and domain scores between adherers and non-adherers for usage intervals Days 1-30, 1-90, 61-90 using t-tests (adherence: ≥4 hours/night on ≥70% of days). Results Of 306 eligible patients, 216 completed Day 10 PIST. Thirteen items had ≥70% endorsement of “not at all”; four items were removed for low communality or overlapping clinical constructs. Cronbach r=0.90. Factor analysis included 27 items with 59% of variance explained by 5 factors: (1) mask-related symptoms and distress, (2) sleep disturbances, (3) psychosocial and practical burdens, (4) device-related challenges, and (5) physiological side effects. For t-tests, 211 participants were included (>2 items incomplete, removed [n=5]). PAP adherence rates were: 59% (Days 1-30); 50% (Days 1-90); 46% (Days 61-90). Total PIST score and domain 1 scores were higher for non-adherers at all outcome intervals (p<.001). Domain 2 and 4 scores were higher for non-adherers for Days 1-30 and Days 1-90 (p<.05). Domain 3 was higher at Day 1-90 (p<.05). Conclusion The 27-item PIST is a valid screening instrument for identifying clinical PAP issues. Early identification of mask-related symptoms, sleep disturbances, and device-related challenges may inform targeted interventions to improve PAP adherence. Support (if any)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sawyer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: