Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study investigates the link between inflammatory score and stroke prevalence, suggesting significant implications.
Systemic inflammation plays a key role in cerebrovascular disease. While C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC) count are individual risk markers, the predictive value of a combined inflammatory score (IS) for stroke prevalence remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate this association in a national population. Data were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2010. An IS was calculated as the sum of standardized Z-scores for CRP and WBC. Weighted multivariable logistic regression assessed the IS-stroke association, adjusting for demographics and clinical confounders. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) models and subgroup analyses were performed. Among 9963 included participants, 345 reported a history of stroke. After full adjustment, individuals in the highest IS quartile had 1.60-fold higher odds of stroke (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.08–2.36) compared to the lowest quartile. Each unit increase in IS was associated with 6% higher odds (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01–1.12). RCS analysis revealed that higher composite IS is independently associated with increased stroke prevalence, suggesting a nonlinear association. The composite IS remained a significant predictor in models where the individual CRP and WBC components did not. This combined index may capture inflammatory burden more comprehensively than either marker alone in cross-sectional analyses. However, given the cross-sectional design, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and require confirmation in prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: