Randomized trial evaluates impact of napping on clinical skills in sleep-deprived residents, suggesting beneficial implications for training.
BACKGROUND: Sleep deprivation is common among anesthesia residents and impairs both technical and non-technical skills such as leadership. Napping is recommended in fatigue management across healthcare and other safety-sensitive sectors, yet its effectiveness for healthcare providers remains underexplored. This study evaluated whether a 30-min nap opportunity improved simulated crisis performance after a 24-h shift. METHODS: Residents were tested twice: once rested and once using a 24-h shift to induce partial sleep deprivation. Between sessions, they were trained in fatigue management. In the sleep-deprived condition, they were randomized to a nap opportunity or a control condition. Actigraphy objectively assessed sleep and nap duration. The primary endpoint was overall simulated clinical performance (0-200; combined technical and non-technical scores). Secondary endpoints were technical and non-technical subscales. Group effects were primarily tested using intention-to-treat regression models adjusted for rested performance, prior sleep, and critical care experience. RESULTS: Thirty-five residents were enrolled (nap opportunity n = 19, control n = 16). In the primary analysis sample (n = 27), clinical performance was 14.8 points higher following the nap opportunity compared with controls (95% confidence interval: 2.8-26.9; p =.018), corresponding to a 7.4% improvement. Technical skills did not differ significantly between groups, although more sleep was associated with better technical performance. Non-technical skills were higher in the nap opportunity condition (+11.0 points; 95% confidence interval: 2.2-19.8; p =.016), including significant effects of leadership and resource utilization. Exploratory analyses suggested associations between longer nap duration and multiple performance domains, strongest for technical skills (p =.010). CONCLUSIONS: Napping appears to enhance clinical performance, while the nap opportunity, nap duration, and prior sleep deprivation each influenced technical and non-technical performance in distinct ways. These findings support integrating napping and recovery into medical education and scheduling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
SCHMIDT et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: