This article examines seventeenth-century theories of consciousness and their enduring influence on opposing nativist and behaviorist theories of language from rationalist and empiricist perspectives. Focusing primarily on Cartesian accounts of consciousness, thought, and linguistic creativity, the study traces how rationalist notions of innate mental capacities informed later developments in Port-Royal Logic and, subsequently, Noam Chomsky’s theory of generative grammar. In contrast, it also explores empiricist approaches to mind and knowledge, particularly those associated with Locke and later behaviorist theorists, which conceptualize language acquisition as a product of experience, habit formation, and environmental conditioning. By systematically comparing these philosophical traditions, the article clarifies the epistemological foundations underlying long-standing debates in language acquisition, pedagogy, and applied linguistics. Drawing exclusively on established philosophical and linguistic sources, the study offers a theoretical–historical synthesis that highlights how implicit assumptions about consciousness and mind continue to shape contemporary approaches to language learning, teaching, and assessment.
Berkay Bulgurlu (Fri,) studied this question.