Recent standardization efforts for graph databases lead to standard query languages like GQL and SQL/PGQ, and constraint languages like Property Graph Constraints (PG-Constraints). In this paper, we embark on the study of repairing property graphs under PG-Constraints. We identify a significant subset of PG-Constraints, encoding denial constraints and including recursion as a key feature, while still permitting automata-based structural analyses of errors. We present a comprehensive repair pipeline for these constraints to repair Property Graphs, involving changes in the graph topology and leading to node, edge and, optionally, label deletions. We investigate three algorithmic strategies for the repair procedure, based on Integer Linear Programming (ILP), a naive, and an LP-guided greedy algorithm. Our experiments on various real-world datasets reveal that repairing with label deletions can achieve a 59% reduction in deletions compared to node/edge deletions. Moreover, the LP-guided greedy algorithm offers a runtime advantage of up to 97% compared to the ILP strategy, while matching the same quality.
Spinrath et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: