Quantifies motion responses in berthed ships, suggesting improved port operability assessments.
Field measurements of ship motions at berth are often sparse, heterogeneous, and collected across multiple vessels and locations, limiting the applicability of conventional response-modelling approaches. This study presents a statistical framework for analysing sea-state-conditioned motion responses using long-term monitoring data with incomplete overlap between degrees of freedom (DoF). Each DoF is analysed independently and conditioned on significant wave height (Hs) and peak wave period (Tp), with directional values retained across the full angular range (0–360°) and examined separately. A two-stage quality-control procedure combining plausibility checks and robust regression removes inconsistent response–sea-state pairs while preserving dominant behaviour. Motion response envelopes are derived by binning observations in sea-state space and computing median and upper-percentile statistics. To quantify sampling uncertainty, bootstrap resampling provides 95% confidence intervals for envelopes and derived metrics, ensuring robust comparative conclusions. Results show systematic growth in motion variability with increasing Hs, with surge exhibiting the strongest translational sensitivity and roll the largest amplification. Synthetic sea surfaces generated using a spectral random-phase approach reproduce prescribed sea-state characteristics, supporting physical interpretation. The study contributes a data-driven framework for heterogeneous berth datasets, robust quality control, uncertainty-aware response envelopes, and statistically consistent synthetic seas, aligning field-based monitoring with practical port operability assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chekure et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: