The article critiques the practice of categorizing continuous variables, suggesting it leads to important statistical drawbacks.
Researchers often take variables that are measured on a continuum and then break them into categories (for example, above or below some cut-point), either to place subjects into groups or as an outcome measure. In this article, we show that the rationales given for this practice are weak and that categorization results in lost information, reduced power of statistical tests, and increased probability of a Type II error. Dichotomizing a continuous variable is justified only when the distribution of that variable is highly skewed or its relation with another variable is nonlinear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David L. Streiner (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: