Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial demonstrates the drawbacks of dichotomizing continuous predictors in regression models, suggesting better analytic approaches.
In medical research, continuous variables are often converted into categorical variables by grouping values into two or more categories. We consider in detail issues pertaining to creating just two groups, a common approach in clinical research. We argue that the simplicity achieved is gained at a cost; dichotomization may create rather than avoid problems, notably a considerable loss of power and residual confounding. In addition, the use of a data-derived 'optimal' cutpoint leads to serious bias. We illustrate the impact of dichotomization of continuous predictor variables using as a detailed case study a randomized trial in primary biliary cirrhosis. Dichotomization of continuous data is unnecessary for statistical analysis and in particular should not be applied to explanatory variables in regression models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Royston et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: