Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simulation study reveals that joint dichotomization more accurately identifies true diagnostic thresholds for interacting continuous variables, suggesting improved disease risk discrimination.
Dichotomization is often used on clinical and diagnostic settings to simplify interpretation. For example, a person with systolic and diastolic blood pressure above 140 over 90 may be prescribed medication. Blood pressure as well as other factors such as age and cholesterol and their interactions may lead to increased risk of certain diseases. When using a dichotomized variable to determine a diagnosis, if the interactions with other variables are not considered, then an incorrect threshold for the continuous variable may be selected. In this paper, we compare single dichotomization with joint dichotomization; the process of simultaneously optimizing cutpoints for multiple variables. A simulation study shows that simultaneous dichotomization of continuous variables is more accurate in recovering both 'true' thresholds given they exist.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nelson et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: